I have a fundamental understanding of "leadership" as an "indicator" of the "acceptance" of the "followers" towards a specific leader/leadership based on the "value" real or perceived that the followers expect to receive from such leader/leadership.
In other words, I see leadership is something that is well-received, welcomed and appreciated by the followers based on the value this leadership can potentially deliver to these followers.
This is dramatically different from "enforced" leadership by "position" and/or "authority" of the claimed leader(s).
You see, I believe "successful/effective" leadership as the "art and "science" of influencing people and convincing them" rather than "pushing" things down their throat as lousy and miserable leaders tend to do.
In other words, I see leadership is something that is well-received, welcomed and appreciated by the followers based on the value this leadership can potentially deliver to these followers.
This is dramatically different from "enforced" leadership by "position" and/or "authority" of the claimed leader(s).
You see, I believe "successful/effective" leadership as the "art and "science" of influencing people and convincing them" rather than "pushing" things down their throat as lousy and miserable leaders tend to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment